Saturday Morning Civics: Episode 3
The Founders’ Favorite Idea: Dividing Power
If you had asked the people who wrote the Constitution what worried them most, they probably wouldn’t have said taxes, trade, or even foreign threats.
The founding fathers had one concern as top priority to avoid:
Too much power in one place.
They had been ruled over and understood the cost, and were not interested in a repeat performance. This collective group had learned in earnest why limiting power must be the overarching goal of the idea of a free, sovereign America.
A Fresh Memory of Concentrated Power
The American founders had just finished a brutal “disagreement” with a mad-hatter king.
The kind of disagreement that involves declarations, independence, and a notable increase in tea-related activity.
King George III represented a system where power was concentrated; laws, enforcement, and authority ultimately flowed from a single source.
This wasn’t a simple inconvenience, it was dangerous. It was a power that demanded absolute submission and affection. While Britain’s Parliament created the policies that enraged American colonists thousands of miles—and an entire ocean—away, Georgie-boy was a symbol of controlling power.
The Seven Years’ War left Britain with empty coffers. Broke as a joke. It seemed to make perfect sense to tax colonists. After all, the red coats were over here keeping things “in order”.
After dealing with the Intolerable Acts long enough, the colonists were fed up. And pushed back. Hard. And won our independence: the right to be a self-governing nation.
So when they sat down to design a new government, the founding fathers started with a guiding question:
How do you build a government strong enough to function… but not strong enough to take over?
Their Answer: Divide It
Instead of placing power in one person or one group, they did something clever. And very American.
They split it up.
This was not a casual process. It was deliberate and meticulous
The Constitution creates three separate branches of government:
A legislative branch to make the laws
An executive branch to enforce the laws
A judicial branch to interpret the laws
Each branch has its own role. And just as importantly, none of them can do everything alone.
Why Three?
This idea didn’t appear out of thin air.
The founders were heavily influenced by a French political thinker named Montesquieu, who argued that liberty depends on separating government powers.
If the same person writes the laws, enforces them, and decides what they mean…you may find yourself on the losing end of all three.
So the founders took that idea and built it into the structure of the Constitution. A system designed to put the power in the hands of the people, with a restricted government.
As we’ve discussed on previous Saturday mornings, the whole point of the Constitution consistently points back to what the government cannot do. It doesn’t tell citizens what they must do; instead, it tells the government what it can and, more importantly, cannot do.
For example, the government can regulate public safety, but it cannot arbitrarily take away rights without due process. The Constitution’s principles and powers are designed to balance these interests, ensuring that government actions are legitimate and fair.
Checks, Balances, and Mild Suspicion
Separation of powers doesn’t just divide responsibilities.
It also creates what we call checks and balances. Not to be confused with balancing a checkbook, but in a way, it could be loosely viewed through that lens. You keep a close eye on your finances, to make sure nothing fishy happens.
Checks and balances means each branch keeps an eye on the others.
Congress passes laws, but the president can veto them. The president enforces laws, but Congress controls the funding. Courts interpret laws, but judges are appointed and confirmed through the political branches.
And if something goes too far, the courts can step in and say:
“This does not align with the Constitution.”
It’s a system built not on blind trust…but on structured skepticism. Very smart, very American.
Not Always Smooth
Now, if this sounds like it could occasionally lead to disagreement—you are absolutely correct.
Separation of powers is not designed for speed, it’s designed for deliberation. And sometimes for frustration. Laws can take time to pass. Branches can disagree. Processes can feel slow, really slow.
But that friction is not a flaw, it’s part of the design. Because the founders believed that slowing things down was often the best way to prevent bad decisions made too quickly.
A System That Requires Participation
One crucial detail:
This system doesn’t run on autopilot. It depends on people like you and me, the blessed American citizen.
Voters choose representatives, officials respecting constitutional limits, and courts carefully interpret laws. The Constitution provides the structure, but citizens provide the energy.
A Final Thought
If there is one theme that runs through the Constitution, it is this:
Power should never be too comfortable. It should be questioned. Divided. Balanced.
And occasionally required to explain itself. Preferably before doing anything too dramatic.
If you take nothing else from today’s civics manual, take this:
The founders did not trust concentrated power, so they made sure it would never be easy to hold.
Even if that means the rest of us occasionally have to wait a little longer for things to get done.
If you enjoy understanding why the system was designed this way, and perhaps appreciating a government built on equal parts structure and suspicion, you’re in the right place.
Coffee recommended.
Quietly Becoming Jess is a free publication and 100% reader supported.
The greatest compliment you could offer is sharing this article with a friend.
If you find value in this writing space and would like to support my work with a donation—of any amount—it is deeply appreciated.
My full-time work is wife, mother, and home educator. The paycheck is hugs and kisses—the very best kind.
Your support helps make it possible for me to continue researching and writing, my small way of contributing thoughtful conversation to the world we’re all trying to understand together.